Controversial U.S. bill would lift Supreme Court ban on patenting human genes
Share
From Science Magazine:
But the witnesses at the hearing had different interpretations of the bill’s text. The intent to preserveMyriad is “inconsistent with the legislative text that’s been put forward,” said patent policy researcher Charles Duan of the R Street Institute in Washington, D.C., in his testimony. The proposed language could make it possible to patent many kinds of “pure scientific research,” he said. “I don’t think that’s the intent, but … that’s what the language does.”
Featured Publications
Examining the DOJ’s National Standards for Law Enforcement De-Escalation Training
BAAJA Blast Part 1: What Does Permitting Reform Mean for Energy and Natural Resources?
Low-Energy Fridays: Is the future of the grid off the grid?
Separating Private Selections from Public Elections Part 3: How could a privatized-party system affect general elections?
Election Policy Landscape Stabilizes as Midterms Approach Part 2: Voter Identification
Lawfare or Justice? Understanding American Prosecution Part 1 — Where Did America’s System of Prosecution Come From?
The Certification Bottleneck: How the U.S. Government Is Slowing Its Own Post-Quantum Migration









