Key Points
Over the past two decades, nearly every state has adopted Net Energy Metering (NEM) as an alternative to monopoly provided electricity, and also to compensate customers for excess electricity generated by small resources, such as solar panels, located on or close to a distribution grid. It has been a critical innovation.
Not unsurprisingly, the model has also come under greater scrutiny lately, such as in July when the FERC denied a petition from the New England Ratepayers Association (NERA) regarding the agency’s jurisdiction over NEM. While NERA was right to highlight potential inequities within NEM, the transactions are appropriately before the states, as the costs and benefits from NEM “predominantly accrue to the distribution system and retail customers.”
While NEM isn’t perfect, with more technology and visibility into the distribution system, distributed energy resources can be valued and compensated more appropriately for the value it provides to the system.
Understanding adoption rates for solar and participation in NEM programs can help guide state action on when it is appropriate for an NEM program to be modified—or eliminated entirely—and on when to transition customers onto the next stage of DER compensation.
Read the press release here.
Featured Publications
Jillian Snider, Lisel Petis
July 9, 2025
Logan Seacrest, Jillian Snider
July 1, 2025
Philip Rossetti
June 24, 2025
Philip Rossetti, Nan Swift
June 24, 2025
Jillian Snider
June 17, 2025
Stacey McKenna, Courtney Joslin
June 12, 2025
Chris McIsaac
June 10, 2025
Stacey McKenna
June 2, 2025
Chelsea Boyd
May 29, 2025