On March 3, the FTC announced that it is seeking comment on a Petition for Rulemaking filed by NetChoice, Americans for Prosperity, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Innovation Economy Institute, Institute for Policy Innovation, James Madison Institute, National Taxpayers Union, R Street Institute, and Young Voices, asking the FTC to amend its rules to include a broader and more detailed recusal process that would apply to enforcement proceedings, along with adjudicative and rulemaking proceedings.Featured Publications
What 1996 Can Teach Us About Today’s High Electricity Prices
10 Practical Ways to Improve State Bail Systems
Low-Energy Fridays: There’s More to a Diesel Ban than Basic Economics
America’s Patent Office Measures IP’s Footprint, Not Its Payoff
Separating Party Selections from Public Elections
Safer Solutions: New guidance urges doctors to include tobacco harm reduction in smoking cessation
The Sanders-Casar “Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act” is AI Authoritarianism
Low-Energy Fridays: Where Have All the Hurricanes Gone?
In the News Wiley Consumer Protection Download
On March 3, the FTC announced that it is seeking comment on a Petition for Rulemaking filed by NetChoice, Americans for Prosperity, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Innovation Economy Institute, Institute for Policy Innovation, James Madison Institute, National Taxpayers Union, R Street Institute, and Young Voices, asking the FTC to amend its rules to include a broader and more detailed recusal process that would apply to enforcement proceedings, along with adjudicative and rulemaking proceedings.









