On March 3, the FTC announced that it is seeking comment on a Petition for Rulemaking filed by NetChoice, Americans for Prosperity, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Innovation Economy Institute, Institute for Policy Innovation, James Madison Institute, National Taxpayers Union, R Street Institute, and Young Voices, asking the FTC to amend its rules to include a broader and more detailed recusal process that would apply to enforcement proceedings, along with adjudicative and rulemaking proceedings.Featured Publications
Examining the DOJ’s National Standards for Law Enforcement De-Escalation Training
BAAJA Blast Part 1: What Does Permitting Reform Mean for Energy and Natural Resources?
Low-Energy Fridays: Is the future of the grid off the grid?
Separating Private Selections from Public Elections Part 3: How could a privatized-party system affect general elections?
Election Policy Landscape Stabilizes as Midterms Approach Part 2: Voter Identification
Lawfare or Justice? Understanding American Prosecution Part 1 — Where Did America’s System of Prosecution Come From?
The Certification Bottleneck: How the U.S. Government Is Slowing Its Own Post-Quantum Migration
In the News Wiley Consumer Protection Download
On March 3, the FTC announced that it is seeking comment on a Petition for Rulemaking filed by NetChoice, Americans for Prosperity, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Innovation Economy Institute, Institute for Policy Innovation, James Madison Institute, National Taxpayers Union, R Street Institute, and Young Voices, asking the FTC to amend its rules to include a broader and more detailed recusal process that would apply to enforcement proceedings, along with adjudicative and rulemaking proceedings.









