On March 3, the FTC announced that it is seeking comment on a Petition for Rulemaking filed by NetChoice, Americans for Prosperity, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Innovation Economy Institute, Institute for Policy Innovation, James Madison Institute, National Taxpayers Union, R Street Institute, and Young Voices, asking the FTC to amend its rules to include a broader and more detailed recusal process that would apply to enforcement proceedings, along with adjudicative and rulemaking proceedings.Featured Publications
The Problem With Telling AI What to Think, No Matter Who Is Asking
Low-Energy Fridays: Will high oil prices induce a shift to clean energy?
Due Processing: Cutting Through AI Hype and Doomerism in American Courtrooms
The Perils of Junk Science in the Courtroom
Hawai’i’s Bail Reform Bill Is Responsible, Not Lenient
Real Insights: Lessons from 20 Years of Peacebuilding
In the News Wiley Consumer Protection Download
On March 3, the FTC announced that it is seeking comment on a Petition for Rulemaking filed by NetChoice, Americans for Prosperity, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Innovation Economy Institute, Institute for Policy Innovation, James Madison Institute, National Taxpayers Union, R Street Institute, and Young Voices, asking the FTC to amend its rules to include a broader and more detailed recusal process that would apply to enforcement proceedings, along with adjudicative and rulemaking proceedings.








