Key Points
American lawmakers have traditionally discouraged risky behaviors with abstinence-only approaches.
These approaches have proven largely ineffective on a population level.
Harm reduction approaches are more successful in that they are individually centered and aim to “meet people where they are.”
Harm reduction does not ignore or minimize the risks associated with certain behaviors.
Existing harm reduction programs have been proven to decrease infectious disease transmissions, reduce smoking rates and improve public health outcomes.
Lawmakers should look to harm reduction as an important tool to address public health crises.
The primary principle of harm reduction is to “meet users where they are,” rather than to demand immediate ces- sation. Based on this principle, individuals engaging in risky behavior are encouraged to use safer techniques and modify behaviors, which may ultimately be pathways to abstinence or cessation.
Featured Publications
Christi M. Smith
March 14, 2023
Adam Thierer
March 9, 2023
Courtney Joslin, Sophia Heimowitz
March 6, 2023
Robert Melvin
March 3, 2023
Josiah Neeley
March 2, 2023
Philip Rossetti
Feb 28, 2023
Sarah Anderson, Anthony Lamorena
Feb 23, 2023
Jerry Theodorou
Feb 23, 2023
Jacob Bastian
Feb 15, 2023
Jacob Bastian
Feb 13, 2023