Presentations
Transmission Cost Drivers and Policy Remedies
Briefing for the Department of Energy
- Status quo
- Perverse incentives of cost-of-service regulation (RSI-consumer paper)
- Policy favors diseconomies of scale & >90% projects exclusive domain of monopolies with no economic criteria/serious oversightOverbuilding inefficient Tx, underbuilding efficient Tx
- RSI-consumer groups Tx cost management joint comment
- Tx need drivers: aging infrastructure, load growth, generation change
- Strategy: “quick” relief + long-term fixes leave consumer-friendly legacy
- Perverse incentives of cost-of-service regulation (RSI-consumer paper)
- Short-term fixes (brownfield upgrades)
- FERC dynamic line ratings (DLR) rulemaking (RSI comments)
- Order 881 precedent: tech-specific rule on “good utility practice”
- Routinize system-enhancement dialogue & information
- DOE funds labs for RTO-specific GETs/reconductoring evaluation
- Consumers pushing independent Tx monitor
- FERC conference on best practices, DOE covers tech status
- Result 1: bottom-up regional stakeholder progress (carrot)
- Result 2: record built for complaints, FPA 206 complaint (stick)
- Expeditious permitting of GETs and reconductoring
- Shift DOE support from mature techs to pilot/demonstration
- e.g., LPO for third-party suppliers or customer reconductoring and GETs
- Improve seams management
- Detailed ideas in RSI paper and Brattle on intertie optimization
- Shift capital from inefficient to efficient planning mechanisms
- FERC dynamic line ratings (DLR) rulemaking (RSI comments)
- Long-term fixes (greenfield ~7-10 years)
- Order 1920 implementation
- Set “high bar” for economic & reliability cost-benefit analysis
- Beneficiary pays cost allocation
- Minimize creep of anti-competitive “right of first refusal”
- Better Tx cost reporting (accuracy and data accessibility)
- Interregional planning and cost allocation (RSI backgrounder)
- Order 1920 implementation