Dear Members of Congress,

As you and your colleagues in Congress continue to finalize funding levels and bill language in the FY22 appropriations bill, the  over 50 undersigned, bipartisan, criminal justice reform, liberty, business, labor, and drug policy organizations write to strongly urge you to maintain the removal of the Congressional budget rider, also known as the “Harris” rider, that has  prohibited the District of Columbia from establishing a regulatory framework for the sale and taxation of marijuana. We  applaud appropriators and leadership in the Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) subcommittee across both  chambers for its historic removal of this rider earlier this Congress. It is imperative to both public health, public safety, and for Congress’ support of the District’s right to home rule that the removal of the Harris rider is maintained.

The District of Columbia is one of 19 jurisdictions that has allowed for access to marijuana for adult use. Yet, because the District is not a state, it is the only jurisdiction that cannot regulate marijuana sales. Congress and the Department of Justice have allowed other states like Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and California, among others, to  exercise their sovereign right to set policy and function as laboratories of democracy; the District of Columbia should be allowed to use local taxpayers’ funds to support local needs as well.

Like many residents of states around the nation, concerned residents of the District of Columbia voted to legalize  marijuana for adult use in 2014 with nearly 65% voter support. Yet, due to the existence of the Harris rider in prior  appropriations bills – every year since the successful passage of Initiative 71 – the District of Columbia remains the  only jurisdiction in the country that cannot regulate marijuana sales or fruitfully tap into the public health and safety  benefits of legalization. [i] Delroy Burton, the former chairman of the D.C. Fraternal Order of Police, said a regulated  market would have “pulled the teeth out of the illegal drug trade” eventually wiping out the violence associated with it. [ii] Without the ability to regulate marijuana sales, the grey market for marijuana flourishes despite the need and want of  the District leadership and residents alike to establish a regulatory model. Such a model would free up law enforcement  resources to focus on threats to public safety. It would also allow legitimate entrepreneurs to start businesses, create  jobs and spur economic development in the District. It is of utmost importance that the District of Columbia be granted  the same capacity as states around the nation that have voted to regulate adult use of marijuana and deliver on the  promises of Initiative 71.

There has been tremendous progress regarding marijuana reform on both the federal and state level. Both in  Congress and nationally, the public conversation has shifted from “should we legalize marijuana?” to “how should  we legalize marijuana?” From 2000 to 2019, the share of Americans saying marijuana should be legal more than  doubled. [iii] A November 2021 Gallup poll reports that 68% of Americans support marijuana legalization, including  50% of Republicans. [iv]

The District of Columbia’s initiative was an important step toward reducing racial disparities in the criminal justice system. A 2013 report found that nine out of 10 drug arrests in Washington D.C. were of African Americans from 2009- 2011. [v] Marijuana law violations are the lead category of drug arrests with simple possession representing six out of 10  drug arrests. [vi] Despite equal rates of use, African Americans in the District disproportionately carried the brunt of  marijuana criminalization and over enforcement. [vii] Residents of the District voted to regulate marijuana in light of these  disparities. There are nearly 700,000 residents living in the District of Columbia; Congress should follow the spirit of  the Home Rule Act, and allow them to set their own local laws. It is time for Congress to support the District of  Columbia’s right to self-determination and lift the rider prohibiting them from regulating marijuana.

For these reasons, we respectfully request that any FY22 spending bill maintain the omission of the Harris rider and adhere to the wishes of nearly 700,000 District residents – as the cardinals of FSGG subcommittee  did earlier this Congress.

We look forward to working together to fulfill our longstanding and shared commitment to protecting and expanding the  rights of residents of the District of Columbia. Please contact Queen Adesuyi, Senior National Policy Manager at the  Drug Policy Alliance, with any questions, at [email protected] or 202-810-1481.

Sincerely,

ACLU of the District of Columbia
AFL-CIO, Washington Metropolitan Council American Civil Liberties Union
Anacostia Coordinating Council
BOWL PAC
Bud Appetit
Center for Disability Rights
Charm City Care Connection
Competitive Enterprise Institute
CURE-DC
The Daniel Initiative
DC Cannabis Business Association
DC Cannabis Trade Association
DC Caucus For Returning Citizens
DC DanceSafe
DC Fiscal Policy Institute
DC for Democracy
DC Jail and Prison Advocacy Project
DC Justice Lab
DC Marijuana Justice (DCMJ)
DC NORML
DC Vote
Doctors for Cannabis Regulation
Dr. Bronner’s
Drug Policy Alliance
Health Care for the Homeless
Health in Justice Action Lab
HIPS
Interfaith Action for Human Rights
International CURE
Jane’s List Political Action Committee
Law Enforcement Action Partnership
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
National Association of Social Workers
National Cannabis Festival
National Cannabis Industry Association
National Employment Law Project
Neighbors United for DC Statehood
New Jersey Association on Correction, Trenton, NJ
NORML
Our Revolution
Plant Medicine Coalition
Public Justice Center
R Street Institute
The Sentencing Project
SPARC
Statehood4DC
StoptheDrugWar.org
Students for Sensible Drug Policy
Supernova Women
The Taifa Group
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 400  Voices for Progress
Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) Weedmaps

[i] “People in D.C’s Increasingly Dangerous Marijuana Gray Market Want Change.” Washington City Paper https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/news/city desk/article/21089133/people-in-dcs-increasingly-dangerous-marijuana-gray-market-want-change

[ii] Cox, John Woodrow. “How D.C. pot legalization has become ‘the dealer protection act of 2015’” The Washington Post. May 17, 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/how-dc-pot-legalization-has-become-the-dealer-protection-act-of-2015/2015/05/17/5cbcd730-f28d-11e4-b2f3- af5479e6bbdd_story.html

[iii] Pew Research Center, “Two-thirds of Americans support marijuana legalization,” November 14, 2019, available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact tank/2019/11/14/americans-support-marijuana-legalization/

[iv] Gallup, “Support for Legal Marijuana Holds at Record High 68%,” November 4, 2021, available at https://news.gallup.com/poll/356939/support-legal marijuana-holds-record-high.aspx

[v] Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, Racial Disparities in Arrests in the District of Columbia, 2009-2011: Implications for Civil Rights  and Criminal Justice in the Nation’s Capital (Washington, D.C.; July 2013), http://www.washlaw.org/pdf/wlc_report_racial_disparities.pdf vi Ibid.

[vii] Ibid.