The High Price of Emergency Spending: What’s the true cost of ad hoc disaster aid?
The cost of providing aid to people in their hour of need is arguably a justifiable expense, but the manner in which emergency responses are funded at the federal level is both fiscally perilous and often ineffective. The true cost of emergency spending can be much higher than the initial estimate and can lead to poor outcomes in the long run.
It is likely that Congress will take up a package of new disaster relief spending in response to the damage Hurricane Ian inflicted on parts of Florida and the Carolinas. Natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes or wildfires are not entirely unexpected. Scientists warn that these and other natural disasters will intensify. It is therefore imperative that better measures be put in place to respond to these disasters in a more sustainable and effective manner.
What Congress Can Do
1. Be better prepared. Disaster response agencies should have plans and resources in place to avoid the need for emergency assistance. Likewise, taking steps to strengthen our economy, reduce debt and employ disaster mitigation techniques can help increase both fiscal and community resilience.
2. Offset new spending. Regardless of whether new spending is considered an emergency, the money spent comes from taxpayers—either now or in the future. New spending should be offset by other budget reductions or increased revenue to avoid adding to our crippling debt.
3. Target immediate needs. Loading disaster response measures down with unrelated projects or spending that requires long-term planning increases the likelihood for waste and fraud. It is disrespectful to victims of disaster to use their loss for political gain. Spending that does not address urgent needs should be considered within the context of annual appropriations against other spending priorities.