Profiles of Ga., Mich., Mo., Ohio, and Pa. Show Gaps Federal Government Must Fill in Next Stimulus Package

For Immediate Release: April 30, 2020

Contact:

Rachael Dean Wilson, Alliance for Securing Democracy, [email protected], 501-951-4455

Rebecca Autrey, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, [email protected], 202-753-5904

William Gray, R Street Institute, [email protected], 202-904-3271

Deborah Todd, University of Pittsburgh Institute for Cyber Law, Policy, and Security, [email protected], 412-624-6687

A new report released today by election security experts provides an in-depth look at the equipment, staffing, supplies, and other costs of administering elections this year that keep voters and election workers safe from the coronavirus while remaining open, accessible, secure, and fair. The authors of Ensuring Safe Elections: Federal Funding Needs for State and Local Governments During the Pandemic worked closely with election officials in five states with varied election systems to develop state-specific profiles of their expenses.

The CARES Act included $400 million in federal funding for state and local governments’ election needs. The total need of the five states featured in Ensuring Safe Elections is at least $414 million.

Experts at the Alliance for Securing Democracy, the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, the R Street Institute, and the University of Pittsburgh Institute for Cyber Law, Policy, and Security authored Ensuring Safe Elections. They profiled Georgia, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

“The funding Congress has provided so far is an important start, but it won’t come close to covering the needs of the states we studied to protect their elections during the pandemic, let alone what is needed for the entire country,” said Elizabeth Howard, Counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law and former Deputy Commissioner for the Virginia Department of Elections. “Congress must invest now in the infrastructure that will stop Covid-19 from interfering with Americans’ ability to cast ballots and have them count.”

The election officials in the five states profiled in Ensuring Safe Elections, like many election officials across the country, are preparing both to expand voting by mail and to establish in-person polling that meets public health standards for preventing the spread of the coronavirus. A sampling of the costs identified by state and local election officials interviewed for the report:

  • Voting by mail:
    • Printing and mailing absentee ballot applications
  • Purchasing centralized vote-tabulation machines (high-speed scanners)
  • Purchasing online absentee ballot application tools
  • Conducting absentee ballot education and outreach
  • In-person voting locations:
  • Supplying personal protective equipment for poll workers, hand sanitizer, gloves, single-use pens, and cleaning supplies
  • Providing plexiglass sneeze guards for poll workers
  • Arranging for curbside voting

“No voter should have to choose between their health and exercising their constitutional right to vote,” said Paul Rosenzweig, Resident Senior Fellow for National Security and Cybersecurity at the R Street Institute, and former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security. “That is why Congress must listen to the states and work in a bipartisan fashion to quickly provide the resources they need to ensure all Americans can vote safely and securely during this pandemic.”

Ensuring Safe Elections finds that covering these costs will fall largely to local election jurisdictions, as opposed to state governments. In Missouri and Ohio, local governments will need to cover more than 90 percent of total election-related costs.

“Congress needs to put politics aside and fund state and local efforts to implement essential election security measures,” said David Levine, Elections Integrity Fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy. “The security of our elections depends on the work of 50 states and over 10,000 local jurisdictions. Our decentralized elections are a strength, but they don’t take place in a vacuum. This report lays out the stark contrast between what state and local officials in five states need to run safe and secure elections during the covid-19 pandemic and what Congress has provided so far. It’s not a pretty picture, but Americans and their representatives need to see it.”

“Pennsylvania’s election officials, like so many others across the country, are facing an unprecedented challenge to our democracy during this public health crisis,” said Christopher Deluzio, Policy Director at the University of Pittsburgh Institute for Cyber Law, Policy, and Security. “More funding is urgently needed to make voting safe and accessible, and the federal government, in particular, must step up and provide additional financial support to the states.”

To read “Ensuring Safe Elections: Federal Funding Needs for State and Local Governments During the Pandemic” click here.