UMich removes two questions related to job applicants’ criminal history, will ask in background check

“The University has been a laggard, not a leader,” Lassiter said. “Many other universities, many other local governments have already (made this decision) — it took way longer than it should have. There’s no justification for why the University delayed this so long.”

Featured Publications

Op-Eds Artificial Intelligence, Technology and Innovation

Overregulating AI Will Disrupt Markets and Discourage Competition

Adam Thierer Nov 17, 2023 Bloomberg Law

Real Solutions Clean Energy, Energy and Environment, Energy Regulatory Reform, Federal Government Affairs

Low-Energy Fridays: The Administration’s Permitting Push Is Too Narrow

Philip Rossetti Dec 1, 2023

In the News Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Policy

The 5×5—Veteran perspectives on cyber workforce development

Brandon Pugh Nov 30, 2023 Atlantic Council

Electoral Reform, Governance, State Policy

What If Republicans Had Encouraged Early Voting by Mail in Nevada?

Matt Germer Nov 30, 2023

Analysis Harm Reduction, Sexual Health

Summarizing STI Statistics and Innovations

Chelsea Boyd Nov 29, 2023

Op-Eds Competition Policy, Federal Government Affairs, Future of Work, Regulatory Reform

New Labor Rules Will Screw Over Your Local McDonalds

C. Jarrett Dieterle Nov 15, 2023 Reason

Analysis Federal Government Affairs, Harm Reduction, Tobacco Harm Reduction

Impact of Missing Science on FDA-CTP Decisions

Jeffrey S. Smith Nov 28, 2023

Analysis Criminal Justice and Civil Liberties, Reentry, State Policy

Spotlight on Criminal Justice: Observing National Restorative Justice Month – November

Christi M. Smith Nov 27, 2023

Real Solutions Electoral Reform, Governance, State Policy

“What If…?”: A Series on How Election Rules Shape Outcomes

Matt Germer Nov 27, 2023

Op-Eds Federal Government Affairs, Harm Reduction, Tobacco Harm Reduction

Blame Biden Health Officials for Vapers’ Turn to Smoking

Steven Greenhut Nov 24, 2023 The American Spectator