WASHINGTON (Jan. 31, 2016) – The federal government’s decision to regulate all nicotine products without regard for the amount of harm they cause will ultimately be detrimental to overall public health, according to a new R Street policy study co-written by Clive Bates, former director of the United Kingdom’s Action on Smoking and Health; R Street President Eli Lehrer; and David Sweanor, professor at the University of Ottawa’s Center for Health Law.

“The vast majority of health harms attributed to smoking arise from burning tobacco cigarettes and inhaling the smoke into the lungs, not from nicotine use,” the authors note. “Where there is no combustion—as with smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes and other vaping products or heated tobacco products—the risks of nicotine use inevitably will be much lower (representing from 2 percent to 10 percent of the risk of cigarettes) because the physical processes are so different.”

The authors show that federal agencies have ignored opportunities to reduce serious disease by replacing high-risk cigarette use with low-risk vaping or smokeless tobacco products, an approach known as tobacco harm reduction. While allowing thousands of cigarette brands to stay on the market, rules promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration will eliminate most of the much lower-risk vaping products. The authors argue a complete reorientation of policy is due:

“None of these products are perfectly safe, as very little is, but they are very much safer. These products with radically reduced risk create opportunities for major health and economic gains through substitution. However, U.S. policy has actively denied and stymied this opportunity,” the authors wrote.

The authors offer eight suggestions for the 115th Congress and the new Trump administration to consider in moving toward a more sensible tobacco policy that benefits public health:

The full, 17-page policy study is available here.

Featured Publications