We’ve got issues: should we privatize the Soo Locks?
But Jarrett Dieterle, a fellow at the R Street Institute in Washington, D.C., says it should not be taxpayers footing the bill. He says either privatizing the lock or allowing the Army Corps of Engineers to charge user fees would make more sense.
Dieterle co-wrote a piece advocating what he calls alternative financing models in the Mackinac Center for Public Policy’s Michigan Capitol Confidential in 2016.“What we suggested was either a privatization model or a user-fee model that would be run by the government,” Dieterle says, “that would essentially unlock immediate funding for the lock and would allow the lock to get funds that weren’t federal to do its repairs and maintenance.”
Featured Publications
Statement on FBI’s 2025 Reported Crimes in the Nation
Smokers Wanting to Quit Need Guidelines on How Vaping Can Help
Lawfare or Justice? Understanding American Prosecution—Six-Part Series
TV: Jillian Snider Discusses Police Use of Force on CNN’s The Situation Room
Why Massachusetts Is Rethinking Police Training
Drone Delivery: Faster, Cleaner, Cheaper … & Stuck in a Regulatory Limbo








