Key Points
Over the past two decades, nearly every state has adopted Net Energy Metering (NEM) as an alternative to monopoly provided electricity, and also to compensate customers for excess electricity generated by small resources, such as solar panels, located on or close to a distribution grid. It has been a critical innovation.
Not unsurprisingly, the model has also come under greater scrutiny lately, such as in July when the FERC denied a petition from the New England Ratepayers Association (NERA) regarding the agency’s jurisdiction over NEM. While NERA was right to highlight potential inequities within NEM, the transactions are appropriately before the states, as the costs and benefits from NEM “predominantly accrue to the distribution system and retail customers.”
While NEM isn’t perfect, with more technology and visibility into the distribution system, distributed energy resources can be valued and compensated more appropriately for the value it provides to the system.
Understanding adoption rates for solar and participation in NEM programs can help guide state action on when it is appropriate for an NEM program to be modified—or eliminated entirely—and on when to transition customers onto the next stage of DER compensation.
Read the press release here.
Featured Publications
Stacey McKenna
March 18, 2024
Stacey McKenna
March 15, 2024
Lisel Petis
March 5, 2024
Sophia Heimowitz, Courtney Joslin
Feb 26, 2024
Sarah Anderson, Anthony Lamorena
Feb 20, 2024
Logan Seacrest
Feb 15, 2024
Jeffrey S. Smith
Feb 14, 2024